#computertech Bot Logged User list

Network: Rizon
Modes: +Nntzl
Last Seen: 36 minutes ago
Topic: Welcome to #computertech || Live music: https://techy.music/ || For help with Duckhunt, type !duckhelp
#4
Rank
324
Users

Channel Log Archive for #computertech

Prev
Next

* All times are UTC
Filtering by user: jmjl
Sunday, July 9, 2023
[13:22:28] jmjl !lastduck
[15:06:43] jmjl &5wq
[15:06:44] jmjl ops
[15:10:44] jmjl o/ ComputerTech
[15:10:50] jmjl how's everything?
[15:11:45] jmjl ComputerTech: I'm there going.
[15:12:28] jmjl DANGPT
[15:12:33] jmjl ops, caps
[15:13:08] jmjl ComputerTech: setup proper sasl identification for ircs://irc.teapot.chat plz :)
[15:15:35] jmjl Esjay: what do you say no to?, I asked him to set proper sasl auth.
[15:30:57] jmjl what
[15:31:09] jmjl why not use km/h
[15:31:36] jmjl they should use m/s as that's the SI system, even my country does it wrong
[15:31:46] jmjl .cc 120km/h to m/s
[17:20:58] jmjl .cc 300 usd to APPL
[17:26:54] jmjl ComputerTech: only error is your message
[17:27:08] jmjl ComputerTech: how would you configure the thing to use oidc or authentik?
[18:42:16] jmjl meow
[18:46:29] jmjl tjr: when you get fiber how will you do to not lose connectivity or does your UXG-Pro have 3 Ethernet ports?
[18:47:26] jmjl tjr: ONT == FTTH?
[18:48:20] jmjl oh, nice
[18:48:36] jmjl tjr: but technically even if it's a fallback you'd drop all connections right?
[18:48:49] jmjl as the fact of switching over makes your ip change
[18:51:38] jmjl tjr: true, and (could you explain me how it would actually be setup in a bussiness setting (with 2 internet companies for redundancy (connected to different parts of the backbone))?
[18:53:25] jmjl tjr: or it would be more likely for those two companies to be connected to the same part of the backbone?
[18:54:01] jmjl thus the routes would be internally redone on some cases, while you'd still get the same IP via BGP
[18:54:37] jmjl yep, I know it would require a ASN, does that mean you'd require having a BGP capable system in your bussiness?
[18:55:04] jmjl o/ foxy
[18:55:34] jmjl tjr: would the same ASN shared across multiple HQs be a good idea or not?
[18:55:46] jmjl HQ -> Headquarters
[18:57:14] jmjl tjr: would it require some kind of business plan or not?
[18:58:43] jmjl tjr: can you explain me how youtube was rerouted by a country's gov accidentally worldwide?
[18:59:02] jmjl !bang
[18:59:57] jmjl tjr: I heard this is still possible, is it?
[19:02:34] jmjl tjr: I also have read about internal IP hijacking (ie, having your lan be the US' DOD IP block
[19:03:24] jmjl tjr: that's a bad idea right?
[19:04:04] jmjl tjr: yep, unless you are the upstream
[19:05:01] jmjl tjr: so basically instead of forwarding it trough the other routers in my network (I have a few repeaters), it would say forward this to 192.168.1.3, and 192.168.1.3 would act as if it were 8.8.8.8
[19:05:21] jmjl oh
[19:05:24] jmjl !lastduck
[19:05:25] jmjl !2lastduck
[19:05:29] jmjl that doesn't exist
[19:09:35] jmjl tjr: except the true upstream in the internet doesn't exist and we rely on this pretty weird protocol called BGP which is a bit fragile right?, have you read the if we were all using ipv6 article someone wrote (don't ask me, I don't remember the url, I'm trying to find it)
[19:09:51] jmjl I know it was a network engineer or someone who helped draft the ipv6 rfc
[19:10:45] jmjl tjr: if this were to be applied oneday, would you think the internet would be better? or being realistic, this would be hard to get applied?
[19:10:53] jmjl s/\?$//
[19:12:25] jmjl !bang
[19:12:30] jmjl !reload
[19:12:39] jmjl no
[19:14:32] jmjl tjr: What keyboard are you using that the ' is different?
[19:15:01] jmjl tjr: yep, as systems are designed for ip4 sometimes :P
[19:15:57] jmjl weird, ’ vs ', seem different, ComputerTech do you see the difference?
[19:16:16] jmjl lol
[19:16:21] jmjl .w ComputerTech
[19:16:25] jmjl .w -u ComputerTech
[19:16:27] jmjl .w -n ComputerTech
[19:16:33] jmjl ComputerTech: I forget
[19:16:42] jmjl .steam -n ComputerTech
[19:16:59] jmjl ComputerTech: is internets closed src?
[19:17:51] jmjl oh
[19:18:29] jmjl thanks
Prev
Next