#computertech Bot Logged User list

Network: TechNet

Modes: +ntf

Last Seen: 2 months, 1 week ago

Topic:

Users

Channel Log Archive for #computertech

Hide Joins

* All times are UTC

Filtering by user: NiniGeo2/rizon

Sunday, May 28, 2023

[02:30:43] NiniGeo2/rizon The chickens were havin' a good day today?

[02:31:40] NiniGeo2/rizon o:

[02:34:27] NiniGeo2/rizon :o

[02:39:30] NiniGeo2/rizon Wooooo friendly chickens!

[02:41:29] NiniGeo2/rizon Yep, chickens just wanna play.

[02:42:42] NiniGeo2/rizon :P

[02:53:33] NiniGeo2/rizon There's a tax writeoff for having hens?

[02:54:25] NiniGeo2/rizon Wait really? :P

[02:54:39] NiniGeo2/rizon The henhouse counts as renting out a property?

[03:01:36] NiniGeo2/rizon Is that intended to also apply to chickens?

[05:56:32] NiniGeo2/rizon :3

[05:56:36] NiniGeo2/rizon I like to share.

[06:13:42] NiniGeo2/rizon Wooooo, thx

[06:14:13] NiniGeo2/rizon It smells like fish in a not great way :P

[06:16:43] NiniGeo2/rizon @______@

[06:23:23] NiniGeo2/rizon :P

[06:27:05] NiniGeo2/rizon Is it 5000?

[06:27:41] NiniGeo2/rizon Woooooo, I win!

[06:27:57] NiniGeo2/rizon You know I've seen some scientific papers where people used the pi symbol as a variable name :3

[06:35:47] NiniGeo2/rizon Wew that one is tricky! :o

[06:37:29] NiniGeo2/rizon Oh yeah I've seen that as well. People use pi for "calculate this series of products" in the same way that people use sigma to mean "calculate this series of sums".

[06:46:13] NiniGeo2/rizon Is it 36? I counted the pixels in the image and measured one of the circles and got 35.3846.

[06:46:23] NiniGeo2/rizon So 36 is plausible!

[06:48:58] NiniGeo2/rizon Hehe, the other way that I'd go about solving this is to constrain a drawing in a CAD tool with the given quantities and then have it solve the system of linear equations to come up with the diameter :P

[06:50:06] NiniGeo2/rizon Well the constraints are the setup and the values we already know. The unknown is supposed to be the radius/diameter.

[06:54:13] NiniGeo2/rizon Wait, why wouldn't it be this instead? "60 + 2x = 24 + 3x"

[06:54:19] NiniGeo2/rizon Why do you need to variables?

[06:54:20] NiniGeo2/rizon two*

[06:54:29] NiniGeo2/rizon Everything is on a single 1D line. You only need one variable for everything.

[06:54:56] NiniGeo2/rizon Two unnamed lengths?

[06:57:01] NiniGeo2/rizon I'm pretty sure that you're right Mikoolo. 36 is also the solution to my "60 + 2x = 24 + 3x".

[06:59:51] NiniGeo2/rizon Ah login, the essential thing to realize is that the top total length of the entire line must be equal to the bottom total length of the entire line (that's where our equals-sign comes from). On top we have d + 12 + d + 12 + d and on the bottom we have 22 + d + 16 + d + 22

[06:59:55] NiniGeo2/rizon Where d is the diameter unknown.

[07:00:02] NiniGeo2/rizon From there I simplified to 60 + 2x = 24 + 3x

[07:00:04] NiniGeo2/rizon And then solved for x.

[07:00:22] NiniGeo2/rizon That really should be "60 + 2d = 24 + 3d"

[07:37:09] NiniGeo2/rizon Duck.

IRC Log Archive

This is a searchable archive of IRC conversations from #computertech on TechNet. Use the search box above to find discussions on specific topics. All conversations are preserved to help the community learn from past discussions.